# Builder audit disposition for T554

The authenticated site audit was run after filling and after the prose adjustment. The final response is attached as audit.json. It is not marked clean: two questions remain for the independent critic.

1. The symbolic geometry parameter is flagged as a possible bundle of two quantities. Here it selects a domain argument of one named quantity r(D,0), just as a domain parameter can index eigenvalues. The formula, definition and value header all name the interior conformal radius. The geometry keys do not select quantities, conventions or specializations. This is the argument exception in the canonical skill and is explicitly required by family #222. The audit source documents that this structural check asks a question and does not read the prose. The builder has retained both groups rather than evading the check with numeric geometry labels or an altered grid. The critic should assess this justification independently.

2. The polygon tag warning says it reaches only this table. The authenticated /api/tag?url=polygon response reports one published table, T17 (294 values), and the public T17 document includes polygon. The public count excludes T553 and T554, which are drafts. Thus the tag already leads to another table; publication of either draft would increase its public count. Keeping this existing, precise tag is preferable to removing it to silence a count-based warning. The API evidence is in tag-evidence.json.

The original third finding, definition length, was addressed by moving the disk and polygon construction into Comments. No numbers or parameter identities were changed. The final and originally checked Numbers mappings were compared exactly.

No audit source, pipeline source or skill was edited. This disposition is builder evidence, not a critique verdict or an offer for review.