# Post-fill evidence for T693

The full completed document and all 61 values were sent once to the existing
draft through the full-document API. See the run’s environment-note.md for the
empty-draft API refusals that required this submission route. No rejected
request wrote values, and no second draft was created.

`BettinConreyAsymptotic().verify(sample=None)` returned:

    <VerifyReport T693: 61/61 matched, 0 differing, 0 missing, 0 extra>

The independent checker was rerun with NUMBERDB_STORED=1. Every stored value
contains both the generator’s enclosure and the independently constructed
700-bit enclosure. All 61 stored sign checks pass, C_0 is the exact string
`1`, and the order is exactly ell=0,...,60. Stored intervals were used directly
in all 32 Tricomi truncation comparisons, including all correction orders at
L=60. The displayed program was executed and agrees on all 61 outputs.
The complete numerical log is attached as readback-output.json.

The audit initially found two documentation issues: an absent client install
command in the generator docstring and an internal link in the definition.
Both were corrected. The link remains in the relevant comment, formula and
Similar tables. Only the generator docstring changed; computation and
selection code are identical to the successfully verified version.

The final authenticated API audit returned an empty findings list and
`clean: true`. Final prose and normalized entry records were read back and
compared with the submitted document; all ten primary attachment byte streams
match the local artifacts. The catalogue state is `in_progress`, meaning
private and not offered for review. This build made no offer, publication or
human-review request.

Instruction provenance: agents/runs/20261109T154709Z-build-skills/manifest.json.
Both archived skill versions hash to
886390324dd1971e381a43cf3b46b822ab0bc67d62f31d8481e29ec79556746b.
See skill-evidence.json for the exact manifest hash and per-version records.
The independent critique must perform its own numerical and argument-selection
review; this evidence is a builder’s report, not an acceptance sidecar.