In this editor you can enter or edit tables in YAML format, and you can get a preview of how numberdb would render it.
You cannot save changes here.
Once everything looks good, upload it to the git repository numberdb-data.
The Keiper-Li coefficients $\lambda_n$, $n\geq 0$, are defined as $\lambda_n = \sum_\rho \big(1-(1-\frac{1}{\rho})^n\big)$, where the sum is interpreted as $\lim_{T\to\infty} \sum_{\rho:|\rho|\leq T}$ over the set of non-trivial zeros $\rho$ of the Riemann zeta function.
Parameters
$n$
— integer ($n \geq 0$)
Formulas
(1)
$\lambda_n = \lambda_{-n}$, if we extend the same definition to negative indices.
(2)
$\lambda_n = \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \frac{d^n}{ds^n}\big(s^{n-1}\log\xi(s)\big)|_{s=1}$ for $n\geq 1$ and $\lambda_0 = 0$, where $\xi(s)$ is the Riemann $\xi$ function $\xi(s) = \frac{1}{2}s(s-1)\pi^{-s/2}\Gamma(s/2)\zeta(s)$
(3)
$\log(2\xi(1/z)) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\lambda_{n}}{n} (1-z)^n$, which is how Keiper originally defined the constants $\lambda^{\text{Keiper}}_n = \lambda_n/n$.
Keiper [5] originally defined $\lambda_n$ with a different normalization: $\lambda^{\text{Keiper}}_n = \frac{1}{n}\lambda_n$.
(10)
The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to $\lambda_n\geq 0$ for all $n$. This is Li's criterion.
References
[1]
Juan Arias de Reyna, "Asymptotics of Keiper-Li coefficients", Functiones et Approximatio Commentarii Mathematici. 45(1) (2011), 7-21. (doi)
[2]
M.W. Coffey, "Relations and positivity results for the derivatives of the Riemann ξ function", J. Comput. Appl. Math. 166 (2004), 525-534.
[3]
Donal F. Connon, "A recurrence relation for the Li/Keiper constants in terms of the Stieltjes constants", (2009), 50 pages.
[4]
Fredrik Johansson, "Rigorous high-precision computation of the Hurwitz zeta function and its derivatives", Numerical Algorithms. 69(2) (2015), 253-270. (arXiv) (doi)
[5]
J. B. Keiper, "Power series expansions of Riemann's $\xi$ function", Math. Comp. 58 (1992), 765-773. (doi)