NumberDB$^\beta$ Advanced search Tags Tables Help Login
Weight enumerators of the classical linear codes
edit · history · discussion · files · long url · combinatorics polynomial
Polynomials
$C$
$a$
$b$ 
$W_C(x)$
Hamming code
2
2:
x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[3,1,3]_2$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
Hamming code
2
3:
x^7 + 7*x^4 + 7*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[7,4,3]_2$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$. It has the same weight enumerator as the quadratic-residue row of length 7.
Hamming code
2
4:
x^15 + 35*x^12 + 105*x^11 + 168*x^10 + 280*x^9 + 435*x^8 + 435*x^7 + 280*x^6 + 168*x^5 + 105*x^4 + 35*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[15,11,3]_2$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$. It has the same weight enumerator as the BCH row with $(n,\delta)=(15,3)$.
Hamming code
2
5:
x^31 + 155*x^28 + 1085*x^27 + 5208*x^26 + 22568*x^25 + 82615*x^24 + 247845*x^23 + 628680*x^22 + 1383096*x^21 + 2648919*x^20 + 4414865*x^19 + 6440560*x^18 + 8280720*x^17 + 9398115*x^16 + 9398115*x^15 + 8280720*x^14 + 6440560*x^13 + 4414865*x^12 + 2648919*x^11 + 1383096*x^10 + 628680*x^9 + 247845*x^8 + 82615*x^7 + 22568*x^6 + 5208*x^5 + 1085*x^4 + 155*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[31,26,3]_2$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
Hamming code
2
6:
x^63 + 651*x^60 + 9765*x^59 + 109368*x^58 + 1057224*x^57 + 8649279*x^56 + 60544953*x^55 + 369776680*x^54 + 1996794072*x^53 + 9621890019*x^52 + 41694856749*x^51 + 163568562192*x^50 + 584173436400*x^49 + 1908310936455*x^48 + 5724932809365*x^47 + 15827726179440*x^46 + 40448633569680*x^45 + 95799462143175*x^44 + 210758816714985*x^43 + 431553634502760*x^42 + 823875120414360*x^41 + 1468647185710635*x^40 + 2447745309517725*x^39 + 3818482327223928*x^38 + 5580858785942664*x^37 + 7647844002734159*x^36 + 9832942289229633*x^35 + 11867343566087520*x^34 + 13449656041565856*x^33 + 14317376396958243*x^32 + 14317376396958243*x^31 + 13449656041565856*x^30 + 11867343566087520*x^29 + 9832942289229633*x^28 + 7647844002734159*x^27 + 5580858785942664*x^26 + 3818482327223928*x^25 + 2447745309517725*x^24 + 1468647185710635*x^23 + 823875120414360*x^22 + 431553634502760*x^21 + 210758816714985*x^20 + 95799462143175*x^19 + 40448633569680*x^18 + 15827726179440*x^17 + 5724932809365*x^16 + 1908310936455*x^15 + 584173436400*x^14 + 163568562192*x^13 + 41694856749*x^12 + 9621890019*x^11 + 1996794072*x^10 + 369776680*x^9 + 60544953*x^8 + 8649279*x^7 + 1057224*x^6 + 109368*x^5 + 9765*x^4 + 651*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[63,57,3]_2$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
Hamming code
3
2:
8*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[4,2,3]_3$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
Hamming code
3
3:
288*x^13 + 2080*x^12 + 5616*x^11 + 11232*x^10 + 13442*x^9 + 11934*x^8 + 8424*x^7 + 4056*x^6 + 1404*x^5 + 468*x^4 + 104*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[13,10,3]_3$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
Hamming code
3
4:
13574209536*x^40 + 271484518400*x^39 + 2646970859520*x^38 + 16764167946240*x^37 + 77534198210560*x^36 + 279123343110144*x^35 + 814109269708800*x^34 + 1977123202129920*x^33 + 4077816057469440*x^32 + 7249450634300160*x^31 + 11236649469540352*x^30 + 15322702647657600*x^29 + 18514932664157280*x^28 + 19939159133321360*x^27 + 19227045183636240*x^26 + 16663439397741552*x^25 + 13018312695070800*x^24 + 9189396562226400*x^23 + 5871003346821600*x^22 + 3399002307386400*x^21 + 1784476023707520*x^20 + 849750401214000*x^19 + 366937791745200*x^18 + 143584340936400*x^17 + 50852749287600*x^16 + 16272895998528*x^15 + 4694111196480*x^14 + 1216985751360*x^13 + 282514367200*x^12 + 58452591600*x^11 + 10716097392*x^10 + 1728206480*x^9 + 243088560*x^8 + 29484000*x^7 + 3026400*x^6 + 258336*x^5 + 18720*x^4 + 1040*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[40,36,3]_3$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
Hamming code
4
2:
18*x^5 + 15*x^4 + 30*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[5,3,3]_4$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
Hamming code
4
3:
163443258*x^21 + 1144097703*x^20 + 3813693030*x^19 + 8050991760*x^18 + 12076865640*x^17 + 13686381765*x^16 + 12166689528*x^15 + 8689505040*x^14 + 5069485260*x^13 + 2440726470*x^12 + 976166100*x^11 + 325516464*x^10 + 90384840*x^9 + 20844810*x^8 + 3982680*x^7 + 617904*x^6 + 75978*x^5 + 7875*x^4 + 630*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary Hamming code with parameters $[21,18,3]_4$. It is the dual of the simplex row with the same $q$ and $m$.
simplex code
2
2:
3*x^2 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[3,2,2]_2$.
simplex code
2
3:
7*x^4 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[7,3,4]_2$.
simplex code
2
4:
15*x^8 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[15,4,8]_2$.
simplex code
2
5:
31*x^16 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[31,5,16]_2$.
simplex code
2
6:
63*x^32 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[63,6,32]_2$.
simplex code
3
2:
8*x^3 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[4,2,3]_3$. It has the same weight enumerator as the Hamming row with the same $q$ and $m$.
simplex code
3
3:
26*x^9 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[13,3,9]_3$.
simplex code
3
4:
80*x^27 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[40,4,27]_3$.
simplex code
4
2:
15*x^4 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[5,2,4]_4$.
simplex code
4
3:
63*x^16 + 1
comment: $q$-ary simplex code with parameters $[21,3,16]_4$.
Reed-Muller code
0
2:
x^4 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[4,1,4]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
0
3:
x^8 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[8,1,8]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
0
4:
x^16 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[16,1,16]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
0
5:
x^32 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[32,1,32]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
1
2:
x^4 + 6*x^2 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[4,3,2]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
1
3:
x^8 + 14*x^4 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[8,4,4]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
1
4:
x^16 + 30*x^8 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[16,5,8]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
1
5:
x^32 + 62*x^16 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[32,6,16]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
2
2:
x^4 + 4*x^3 + 6*x^2 + 4*x + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[4,4,1]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
2
3:
x^8 + 28*x^6 + 70*x^4 + 28*x^2 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[8,7,2]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
2
4:
x^16 + 140*x^12 + 448*x^10 + 870*x^8 + 448*x^6 + 140*x^4 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[16,11,4]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
2
5:
x^32 + 620*x^24 + 13888*x^20 + 36518*x^16 + 13888*x^12 + 620*x^8 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[32,16,8]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
3
3:
x^8 + 8*x^7 + 28*x^6 + 56*x^5 + 70*x^4 + 56*x^3 + 28*x^2 + 8*x + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[8,8,1]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
3
4:
x^16 + 120*x^14 + 1820*x^12 + 8008*x^10 + 12870*x^8 + 8008*x^6 + 1820*x^4 + 120*x^2 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[16,15,2]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
3
5:
x^32 + 1240*x^28 + 27776*x^26 + 330460*x^24 + 2011776*x^22 + 7063784*x^20 + 14721280*x^18 + 18796230*x^16 + 14721280*x^14 + 7063784*x^12 + 2011776*x^10 + 330460*x^8 + 27776*x^6 + 1240*x^4 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[32,26,4]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
4
4:
x^16 + 16*x^15 + 120*x^14 + 560*x^13 + 1820*x^12 + 4368*x^11 + 8008*x^10 + 11440*x^9 + 12870*x^8 + 11440*x^7 + 8008*x^6 + 4368*x^5 + 1820*x^4 + 560*x^3 + 120*x^2 + 16*x + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[16,16,1]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
4
5:
x^32 + 496*x^30 + 35960*x^28 + 906192*x^26 + 10518300*x^24 + 64512240*x^22 + 225792840*x^20 + 471435600*x^18 + 601080390*x^16 + 471435600*x^14 + 225792840*x^12 + 64512240*x^10 + 10518300*x^8 + 906192*x^6 + 35960*x^4 + 496*x^2 + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[32,31,2]_2$.
Reed-Muller code
5
5:
x^32 + 32*x^31 + 496*x^30 + 4960*x^29 + 35960*x^28 + 201376*x^27 + 906192*x^26 + 3365856*x^25 + 10518300*x^24 + 28048800*x^23 + 64512240*x^22 + 129024480*x^21 + 225792840*x^20 + 347373600*x^19 + 471435600*x^18 + 565722720*x^17 + 601080390*x^16 + 565722720*x^15 + 471435600*x^14 + 347373600*x^13 + 225792840*x^12 + 129024480*x^11 + 64512240*x^10 + 28048800*x^9 + 10518300*x^8 + 3365856*x^7 + 906192*x^6 + 201376*x^5 + 35960*x^4 + 4960*x^3 + 496*x^2 + 32*x + 1
comment: binary Reed-Muller code with parameters $[32,32,1]_2$.
quadratic-residue code
2
7:
x^7 + 7*x^4 + 7*x^3 + 1
comment: quadratic-residue code with parameters $[7,4,3]_2$. It has the same weight enumerator as the binary Hamming row with $m=3$.
quadratic-residue code
2
17:
x^17 + 34*x^12 + 68*x^11 + 68*x^10 + 85*x^9 + 85*x^8 + 68*x^7 + 68*x^6 + 34*x^5 + 1
comment: quadratic-residue code with parameters $[17,9,5]_2$.
quadratic-residue code
2
23:
x^23 + 253*x^16 + 506*x^15 + 1288*x^12 + 1288*x^11 + 506*x^8 + 253*x^7 + 1
comment: quadratic-residue code with parameters $[23,12,7]_2$. It has the same weight enumerator as the perfect binary Golay row.
quadratic-residue code
2
31:
x^31 + 155*x^24 + 465*x^23 + 5208*x^20 + 8680*x^19 + 18259*x^16 + 18259*x^15 + 8680*x^12 + 5208*x^11 + 465*x^8 + 155*x^7 + 1
comment: quadratic-residue code with parameters $[31,16,7]_2$. It has the same weight enumerator as the BCH row with $(n,\delta)=(31,7)$.
quadratic-residue code
3
11:
24*x^11 + 110*x^9 + 330*x^8 + 132*x^6 + 132*x^5 + 1
comment: quadratic-residue code with parameters $[11,6,5]_3$. It has the same weight enumerator as the perfect ternary Golay row.
quadratic-residue code
3
13:
28*x^13 + 26*x^12 + 234*x^11 + 442*x^10 + 520*x^9 + 390*x^8 + 286*x^7 + 182*x^6 + 78*x^5 + 1
comment: quadratic-residue code with parameters $[13,7,5]_3$.
Golay code
2
23:
x^23 + 253*x^16 + 506*x^15 + 1288*x^12 + 1288*x^11 + 506*x^8 + 253*x^7 + 1
comment: Golay code with parameters $[23,12,7]_2$. This is the perfect Golay code. It has the same weight enumerator as the quadratic-residue row of length 23.
Golay code
2
24:
x^24 + 759*x^16 + 2576*x^12 + 759*x^8 + 1
comment: Golay code with parameters $[24,12,8]_2$. This is the extended Golay code.
Golay code
3
11:
24*x^11 + 110*x^9 + 330*x^8 + 132*x^6 + 132*x^5 + 1
comment: Golay code with parameters $[11,6,5]_3$. This is the perfect Golay code. It has the same weight enumerator as the quadratic-residue row of length 11.
Golay code
3
12:
24*x^12 + 440*x^9 + 264*x^6 + 1
comment: Golay code with parameters $[12,6,6]_3$. This is the extended Golay code.
BCH code
15
3:
x^15 + 35*x^12 + 105*x^11 + 168*x^10 + 280*x^9 + 435*x^8 + 435*x^7 + 280*x^6 + 168*x^5 + 105*x^4 + 35*x^3 + 1
comment: binary primitive narrow-sense BCH code with parameters $[15,11,3]_2$. The designed distance is $\delta=3$. It has the same weight enumerator as the binary Hamming row with $m=4$.
BCH code
15
5:
x^15 + 18*x^10 + 30*x^9 + 15*x^8 + 15*x^7 + 30*x^6 + 18*x^5 + 1
comment: binary primitive narrow-sense BCH code with parameters $[15,7,5]_2$. The designed distance is $\delta=5$.
BCH code
15
7:
x^15 + 15*x^8 + 15*x^7 + 1
comment: binary primitive narrow-sense BCH code with parameters $[15,5,7]_2$. The designed distance is $\delta=7$.
BCH code
31
7:
x^31 + 155*x^24 + 465*x^23 + 5208*x^20 + 8680*x^19 + 18259*x^16 + 18259*x^15 + 8680*x^12 + 5208*x^11 + 465*x^8 + 155*x^7 + 1
comment: binary primitive narrow-sense BCH code with parameters $[31,16,7]_2$. The designed distance is $\delta=7$. It has the same weight enumerator as the quadratic-residue row of length 31.
BCH code
31
11:
x^31 + 186*x^20 + 310*x^19 + 527*x^16 + 527*x^15 + 310*x^12 + 186*x^11 + 1
comment: binary primitive narrow-sense BCH code with parameters $[31,11,11]_2$. The designed distance is $\delta=11$.
Definition
For a named classical linear code $C$ over a finite field [2], this table gives the Hamming weight enumerator $W_C(x)=\sum_{i=0}^n A_i x^i$ [1], where $n$ is the length of $C$ and $A_i$ is the number of codewords of Hamming weight $i$.
Parameters
$C$
—   code family (one of the named linear-code families listed in the comments)
$a$
—   first code parameter (the first integer parameter for the named family: $q$ on the Hamming, simplex, Golay and quadratic-residue rows; the order $r$ on the Reed-Muller rows; and the length $n$ on the BCH rows)
$b$
—   second code parameter (the second integer parameter for the named family: $m$ on the Hamming, simplex and Reed-Muller rows; the length $n$ on the Golay and quadratic-residue rows; and the designed distance $\delta$ on the BCH rows)
Formulas
(1)
If $C$ is a linear code over $\mathbb{F}_q$ and $C^\perp$ is its dual, then $W_{C^\perp}(x)=|C|^{-1}(1+(q-1)x)^n W_C((1-x)/(1+(q-1)x))$.
(2)
The $q$-ary simplex code with parameter $m$ has $W_C(x)=1+(q^m-1)x^{q^{m-1}}$.
Comments
(3)
Entry addresses use hamming,q,m and simplex,q,m for the $q$-ary Hamming code [3] and its dual simplex code [4]; golay,q,n for the binary and ternary Golay codes [5] of length $n$; rm,r,m for the binary Reed-Muller code $RM(r,m)$ [6]; qr,q,n for the quadratic-residue code [7] over $\mathbb{F}_q$ of length $n$; and bch,n,delta for the binary primitive narrow-sense BCH code [8] of length $n$ and designed distance $\delta$.
(4)
This table stores the dehomogenised enumerator $W_C(x)=\sum_i A_i x^i$. The homogeneous form is recovered as $W_C(X,Y)=X^n W_C(Y/X)$.
(5)
The coefficient of $x^i$ counts codewords of Hamming weight $i$, so $A_0=1$ and $W_C(1)=|C|$.
(6)
The BCH rows are binary primitive narrow-sense BCH codes: for length $n=2^m-1$, the generator polynomial is the least common multiple of the minimal polynomials of $\alpha,\alpha^2,\ldots,\alpha^{\delta-1}$, where $\alpha$ is primitive in $\mathbb{F}_{2^m}$. In an entry comment, the third entry of $[n,k,d]$ is the true minimum distance $d$, which may exceed the designed distance $\delta$.
Programs
(P1)
Sage
from sage.all import GF, ZZ, PolynomialRing, codes


def weight_enumerator(C):
    R = PolynomialRing(ZZ, "x")
    x = R.gen()
    return sum(ZZ(A) * x**i for i, A in enumerate(C.weight_distribution()))


# Choose any Sage linear code here.
C = codes.HammingCode(GF(2), 3)
print(weight_enumerator(C))
Links
Similar tables
Krawtchouk polynomials of the Hamming scheme —   the Krawtchouk polynomials are the kernel of the MacWilliams transform for Hamming weight enumerators
Data properties
Entries are of type: integral polynomial
How well the digits are known: exact
Table is complete: no (it holds the Hamming and simplex rows with $q=2$ and $2\leq m\leq6$, $q=3$ and $2\leq m\leq4$, and $q=4$ and $2\leq m\leq3$; every binary Reed-Muller row $RM(r,m)$ with $2\leq m\leq5$; the binary and ternary Golay codes, ordinary and extended; the quadratic-residue rows $(q,n)=(2,7),(3,11),(3,13),(2,17),(2,23),(2,31)$; and the binary primitive narrow-sense BCH rows $(n,\delta)=(15,3),(15,5),(15,7),(31,7)$ and $(31,11)$)
Sources of data: [1], [2]
How they were obtained:

The entries are exact integer polynomials. The generator checks $W_C(1)=|C|$, the stated minimum distance, and the degree bound on every row. It checks Hamming rows from the simplex rows by the MacWilliams identity, Reed-Muller rows against their dual Reed-Muller rows, the perfect binary and ternary Golay rows against the corresponding quadratic-residue constructions, and every BCH and quadratic-residue cyclic generator polynomial against its defining roots.

more

This table holds 53 entries; the longest written value is 1183 characters at the binary Hamming row hamming,2,6, and the entries block is 12.6 KB.



API Python package Skill for AI Privacy Legal notice Source
Data licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. No tracking, no analytics, essential cookies only.