Best known packings of equal circles in a circle

$n$

normalisation

$d_n$ or $R_n$

2

$d_n$:

2

comment: $d_2=2$. Optimality is proven by [1].

2

$R_n$:

2

comment: $R_2=2$. Optimality is proven by [1].

3

$d_n$:

1.732050807568877293527446341505872366942805253810380628055806979451933016908800037081146186757248576

comment: $d_3=\sqrt{3}$. Optimality is proven by [1].

3

$R_n$:

2.154700538379251529018297561003914911295203502540253752037204652967955344605866691387430791171499050

comment: $R_3=1+2/\sqrt{3}$. Optimality is proven by [1].

4

$d_n$:

1.414213562373095048801688724209698078569671875376948073176679737990732478462107038850387534327641573

comment: $d_4=\sqrt{2}$. Optimality is proven by [1].

4

$R_n$:

2.414213562373095048801688724209698078569671875376948073176679737990732478462107038850387534327641573

comment: $R_4=1+\sqrt{2}$. Optimality is proven by [1].

5

$d_n$:

1.175570504584946258337411909278145537195304875286291982144544961514556948324703915017008099725482672

comment: $d_5=2\sin(\pi/5)$. Optimality is proven by [1].

5

$R_n$:

2.701301616704079864363080994126022144480802807529633763673480484755768094727917933388640728557035243

comment: $R_5=1+\csc(\pi/5)$. Optimality is proven by [1].

6

$d_n$:

1

comment: $d_6=1$. Optimality is proven by [1].

6

$R_n$:

3

comment: $R_6=3$. Optimality is proven by [1].

7

$d_n$:

1

comment: $d_7=1$. Optimality is proven by [1].

7

$R_n$:

3

comment: $R_7=3$. Optimality is proven by [1].

8

$d_n$:

0.8677674782351162409515366656967175092199814555749197528890946070644065033063968430415680435489122042

comment: $d_8=2\sin(\pi/7)$. Optimality is proven by [1].

8

$R_n$:

3.304764870962486505241150223546855113444501887606321162063106296466853342778479596379111421974761794

comment: $R_8=1+\csc(\pi/7)$. Optimality is proven by [1].

9

$d_n$:

0.7653668647301795434569199680607977335226891249712540828676012712550920679201793844740275706845670943

comment: $d_9=2\sin(\pi/8)$. Optimality is proven by [1].

9

$R_n$:

3.613125929752753055713286346854374307167522376698539055097796733816162082922384101903707440385256286

comment: $R_9=1+\csc(\pi/8)$. Optimality is proven by [1].

10

$d_n$:

0.710978236

comment: Optimality is proven by [1].

10

$R_n$:

3.81302563

comment: Optimality is proven by [1].

11

$d_n$:

0.6840402866513374660881992293645191615261667350283212569300969953694295274041551991283803646770510951

comment: $d_{11}=2\sin(\pi/9)$. Optimality is proven by [2].

11

$R_n$:

3.923804400163087252232754413366291703873505661518924481710636986355345162799351809839255581031026313

comment: $R_{11}=1+\csc(\pi/9)$. Optimality is proven by [2].

12

$d_n$:

0.660152735

comment: Optimality is proven by [3].

12

$R_n$:

4.02960193

comment: Optimality is proven by [3].

13

$d_n$:

0.6180339887498948482045868343656381177203091798057628621354486227052604628189024497072072041893911375

comment: $d_{13}=(\sqrt{5}-1)/2$. Optimality is proven by [4].

13

$R_n$:

4.236067977499789696409173668731276235440618359611525724270897245410520925637804899414414408378782275

comment: $R_{13}=2+\sqrt{5}$. Optimality is proven by [4].

14

$d_n$:

0.600884161

comment: Optimality is proven by [5].

14

$R_n$:

4.32842855

comment: Optimality is proven by [5].

15

$d_n$:

0.567962868

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

15

$R_n$:

4.52135696

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

16

$d_n$:

0.553185219

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

16

$R_n$:

4.61542559

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

17

$d_n$:

0.527421466

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

17

$R_n$:

4.79203375

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

18

$d_n$:

0.5176380902050415246977976752480966566981378026398610276280064146301139494976039938447359493884993310

comment: Packomania [7] lists a packing with separation $2\sin(\pi/12)$ as the best known, the same separation proven optimal for $n=19$ by [6]; optimality for $n=18$ is open.

18

$R_n$:

4.863703305156273146998972798915589470535619356033618201609372305241692855919422065390246967432281808

comment: Packomania [7] lists a packing with enclosing radius $1+\csc(\pi/12)$ as the best known, the same radius proven optimal for $n=19$ by [6]; optimality for $n=18$ is open.

19

$d_n$:

0.5176380902050415246977976752480966566981378026398610276280064146301139494976039938447359493884993310

comment: $d_{19}=2\sin(\pi/12)$. Optimality is proven by [6].

19

$R_n$:

4.863703305156273146998972798915589470535619356033618201609372305241692855919422065390246967432281808

comment: $R_{19}=1+\csc(\pi/12)$. Optimality is proven by [6].

20

$d_n$:

0.485163607

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

20

$R_n$:

5.12232074

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

21

$d_n$:

0.470331769

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

21

$R_n$:

5.25231748

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

22

$d_n$:

0.450478965

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

22

$R_n$:

5.43971896

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

23

$d_n$:

0.440024233

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

23

$R_n$:

5.54520422

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

24

$d_n$:

0.429953937

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

24

$R_n$:

5.65166109

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

25

$d_n$:

0.420802424

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

25

$R_n$:

5.75282433

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

26

$d_n$:

0.414235061

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

26

$R_n$:

5.82817654

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

27

$d_n$:

0.407631028

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

27

$R_n$:

5.90639785

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

28

$d_n$:

0.398808512

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

28

$R_n$:

6.01493810

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

29

$d_n$:

0.389211228

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

29

$R_n$:

6.13859790

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

30

$d_n$:

0.384782538

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

30

$R_n$:

6.19774107

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

31

$d_n$:

0.377964473

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

31

$R_n$:

6.29150262

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

32

$d_n$:

0.368360556

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

32

$R_n$:

6.42946297

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

33

$d_n$:

0.364517627

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

33

$R_n$:

6.48670312

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

34

$d_n$:

0.356445428

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

34

$R_n$:

6.61095709

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

35

$d_n$:

0.351051420

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

35

$R_n$:

6.69717109

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

36

$d_n$:

0.348022566

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

36

$R_n$:

6.74675379

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

37

$d_n$:

0.347296355

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

37

$R_n$:

6.75877048

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

38

$d_n$:

0.335464260

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

38

$R_n$:

6.96188697

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

39

$d_n$:

0.330148274

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

39

$R_n$:

7.05788416

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

40

$d_n$:

0.326592122

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

40

$R_n$:

7.12384644

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

41

$d_n$:

0.319488189

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

41

$R_n$:

7.26001233

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

42

$d_n$:

0.315119609

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

42

$R_n$:

7.34679641

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

43

$d_n$:

0.311529156

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

43

$R_n$:

7.41994486

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

44

$d_n$:

0.307785274

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

44

$R_n$:

7.49803668

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

45

$d_n$:

0.304279123

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

45

$R_n$:

7.57291233

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

46

$d_n$:

0.300743743

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

46

$R_n$:

7.65017991

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

47

$d_n$:

0.297434477

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

47

$R_n$:

7.72417005

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

48

$d_n$:

0.294495666

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

48

$R_n$:

7.79127143

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

49

$d_n$:

0.290407648

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

49

$R_n$:

7.88687096

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

50

$d_n$:

0.287872703

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

50

$R_n$:

7.94751527

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

51

$d_n$:

0.284595948

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

51

$R_n$:

8.02750695

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

52

$d_n$:

0.282297789

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

52

$R_n$:

8.08471719

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

53

$d_n$:

0.278567717

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

53

$R_n$:

8.17958283

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

54

$d_n$:

0.277624221

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

54

$R_n$:

8.20398238

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

55

$d_n$:

0.277350098

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

55

$R_n$:

8.21110255

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

56

$d_n$:

0.270873149

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

56

$R_n$:

8.38352992

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

57

$d_n$:

0.268557864

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

57

$R_n$:

8.44718465

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

58

$d_n$:

0.265796493

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

58

$R_n$:

8.52455377

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

59

$d_n$:

0.263417848

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

59

$R_n$:

8.59249996

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

60

$d_n$:

0.261567159

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

60

$R_n$:

8.64621985

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

61

$d_n$:

0.261052384

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

61

$R_n$:

8.66129758

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

62

$d_n$:

0.255435495

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

62

$R_n$:

8.82976541

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

63

$d_n$:

0.253409898

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

63

$R_n$:

8.89235154

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

64

$d_n$:

0.251194079

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

64

$R_n$:

8.96197111

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

65

$d_n$:

0.249457513

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

65

$R_n$:

9.01739732

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

66

$d_n$:

0.247027047

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

66

$R_n$:

9.09627943

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

67

$d_n$:

0.244828851

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

67

$R_n$:

9.16897188

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

68

$d_n$:

0.243020047

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

68

$R_n$:

9.22977375

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

69

$d_n$:

0.241844950

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

69

$R_n$:

9.26976127

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

70

$d_n$:

0.239645712

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

70

$R_n$:

9.34565319

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

71

$d_n$:

0.237648321

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

71

$R_n$:

9.41579690

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

72

$d_n$:

0.236019089

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

72

$R_n$:

9.47389086

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

73

$d_n$:

0.234182545

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

73

$R_n$:

9.54034615

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

74

$d_n$:

0.232849668

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

74

$R_n$:

9.58923276

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

75

$d_n$:

0.230626518

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

75

$R_n$:

9.67202963

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

76

$d_n$:

0.229105656

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

76

$R_n$:

9.72959680

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

77

$d_n$:

0.227300832

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

77

$R_n$:

9.79891192

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

78

$d_n$:

0.225791996

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

78

$R_n$:

9.85770990

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

79

$d_n$:

0.224591325

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

79

$R_n$:

9.90506347

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

80

$d_n$:

0.223011390

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

80

$R_n$:

9.96815181

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

81

$d_n$:

0.221954293

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

81

$R_n$:

10.0108642

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

82

$d_n$:

0.220974350

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

82

$R_n$:

10.0508242

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

83

$d_n$:

0.219373827

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

83

$R_n$:

10.1168579

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

84

$d_n$:

0.218590442

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

84

$R_n$:

10.1495309

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

85

$d_n$:

0.218266471

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

85

$R_n$:

10.1631115

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

86

$d_n$:

0.215083805

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

86

$R_n$:

10.2987011

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

87

$d_n$:

0.213601993

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

87

$R_n$:

10.3632085

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

88

$d_n$:

0.212036514

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

88

$R_n$:

10.4323377

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

89

$d_n$:

0.210515417

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

89

$R_n$:

10.5004918

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

90

$d_n$:

0.209510319

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

90

$R_n$:

10.5460692

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

91

$d_n$:

0.209056927

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

91

$R_n$:

10.5667722

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

92

$d_n$:

0.206512456

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

92

$R_n$:

10.6846458

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

93

$d_n$:

0.205479045

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

93

$R_n$:

10.7333526

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

94

$d_n$:

0.204540133

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

94

$R_n$:

10.7780322

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

95

$d_n$:

0.203247798

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

95

$R_n$:

10.8402050

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

96

$d_n$:

0.202363550

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

96

$R_n$:

10.8832028

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

97

$d_n$:

0.201235787

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

97

$R_n$:

10.9385901

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

98

$d_n$:

0.200413189

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

98

$R_n$:

10.9793831

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

99

$d_n$:

0.199339366

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

99

$R_n$:

11.0331412

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

100

$d_n$:

0.198370393

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

100

$R_n$:

11.0821497

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

101

$d_n$:

0.197103882

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

101

$R_n$:

11.1469336

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

102

$d_n$:

0.196138745

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

102

$R_n$:

11.1968635

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

103

$d_n$:

0.194834099

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

103

$R_n$:

11.2651436

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

104

$d_n$:

0.193842429

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

104

$R_n$:

11.3176586

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

105

$d_n$:

0.193000646

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

105

$R_n$:

11.3626596

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

106

$d_n$:

0.191904796

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

106

$R_n$:

11.4218344

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

107

$d_n$:

0.190984540

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

107

$R_n$:

11.4720518

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

108

$d_n$:

0.190041518

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

108

$R_n$:

11.5240161

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

109

$d_n$:

0.189355941

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

109

$R_n$:

11.5621191

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

110

$d_n$:

0.188379588

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

110

$R_n$:

11.6168616

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

111

$d_n$:

0.187567797

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

111

$R_n$:

11.6628112

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

112

$d_n$:

0.186823794

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

112

$R_n$:

11.7052745

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

113

$d_n$:

0.186089301

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

113

$R_n$:

11.7475281

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

114

$d_n$:

0.185267983

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

114

$R_n$:

11.7951734

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

115

$d_n$:

0.184510798

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

115

$R_n$:

11.8394740

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

116

$d_n$:

0.183541730

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

116

$R_n$:

11.8967045

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

117

$d_n$:

0.182757296

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

117

$R_n$:

11.9434755

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

118

$d_n$:

0.182057322

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

118

$R_n$:

11.9855510

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

119

$d_n$:

0.181121122

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

119

$R_n$:

12.0423344

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

120

$d_n$:

0.180420538

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

120

$R_n$:

12.0852125

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

121

$d_n$:

0.179778463

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

121

$R_n$:

12.1248031

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

122

$d_n$:

0.178501704

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

122

$R_n$:

12.2043748

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

123

$d_n$:

0.177361571

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

123

$R_n$:

12.2763999

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

124

$d_n$:

0.176651786

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

124

$R_n$:

12.3217083

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

125

$d_n$:

0.175928955

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

125

$R_n$:

12.3682253

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

126

$d_n$:

0.175175152

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

126

$R_n$:

12.4171444

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

127

$d_n$:

0.174496476

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

127

$R_n$:

12.4615495

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

128

$d_n$:

0.173879444

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

128

$R_n$:

12.5022222

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

129

$d_n$:

0.173104453

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

129

$R_n$:

12.5537178

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

130

$d_n$:

0.172408740

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

130

$R_n$:

12.6003400

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

131

$d_n$:

0.171679413

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

131

$R_n$:

12.6496205

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

132

$d_n$:

0.171123920

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

132

$R_n$:

12.6874368

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

133

$d_n$:

0.170426371

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

133

$R_n$:

12.7352731

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

134

$d_n$:

0.169902658

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

134

$R_n$:

12.7714462

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

135

$d_n$:

0.169287021

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

135

$R_n$:

12.8142548

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

136

$d_n$:

0.168552210

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

136

$R_n$:

12.8657596

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

137

$d_n$:

0.167863112

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

137

$R_n$:

12.9144699

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

138

$d_n$:

0.167205845

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

138

$R_n$:

12.9613043

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

139

$d_n$:

0.166541937

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

139

$R_n$:

13.0089872

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

140

$d_n$:

0.165840539

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

140

$R_n$:

13.0597775

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

141

$d_n$:

0.165190206

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

141

$R_n$:

13.1072553

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

142

$d_n$:

0.164657683

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

142

$R_n$:

13.1464116

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

143

$d_n$:

0.163969359

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

143

$R_n$:

13.1974008

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

144

$d_n$:

0.163294776

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

144

$R_n$:

13.2477892

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

145

$d_n$:

0.162910645

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

145

$R_n$:

13.2766686

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

146

$d_n$:

0.162189773

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

146

$R_n$:

13.3312338

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

147

$d_n$:

0.161850109

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

147

$R_n$:

13.3571125

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

148

$d_n$:

0.161460385

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

148

$R_n$:

13.3869394

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

149

$d_n$:

0.160829255

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

149

$R_n$:

13.4355485

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

150

$d_n$:

0.160503256

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

150

$R_n$:

13.4608064

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

151

$d_n$:

0.160305330

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

151

$R_n$:

13.4761915

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

152

$d_n$:

0.159594649

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

152

$R_n$:

13.5317485

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

153

$d_n$:

0.158836848

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

153

$R_n$:

13.5915367

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

154

$d_n$:

0.158266693

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

154

$R_n$:

13.6368977

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

155

$d_n$:

0.157807005

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

155

$R_n$:

13.6737086

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

156

$d_n$:

0.157277677

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

156

$R_n$:

13.7163628

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

157

$d_n$:

0.156580386

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

157

$R_n$:

13.7729919

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

158

$d_n$:

0.155966994

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

158

$R_n$:

13.8232259

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

159

$d_n$:

0.155470300

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

159

$R_n$:

13.8641934

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

160

$d_n$:

0.154802992

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

160

$R_n$:

13.9196469

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

161

$d_n$:

0.154209135

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

161

$R_n$:

13.9694003

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

162

$d_n$:

0.153725865

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

162

$R_n$:

14.0101723

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

163

$d_n$:

0.153078363

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

163

$R_n$:

14.0652037

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

164

$d_n$:

0.152559940

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

164

$R_n$:

14.1096014

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

165

$d_n$:

0.152156754

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

165

$R_n$:

14.1443393

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

166

$d_n$:

0.151679719

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

166

$R_n$:

14.1856784

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

167

$d_n$:

0.151296842

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

167

$R_n$:

14.2190466

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

168

$d_n$:

0.150855650

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

168

$R_n$:

14.2577069

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

169

$d_n$:

0.150428440

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

169

$R_n$:

14.2953582

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

170

$d_n$:

0.150024563

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

170

$R_n$:

14.3311503

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

171

$d_n$:

0.149614800

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

171

$R_n$:

14.3676614

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

172

$d_n$:

0.149067107

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

172

$R_n$:

14.4167761

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

173

$d_n$:

0.148684056

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

173

$R_n$:

14.4513414

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

174

$d_n$:

0.148226666

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

174

$R_n$:

14.4928488

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

175

$d_n$:

0.147749482

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

175

$R_n$:

14.5364265

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

176

$d_n$:

0.147339031

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

176

$R_n$:

14.5741357

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

177

$d_n$:

0.146902001

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

177

$R_n$:

14.6145184

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

178

$d_n$:

0.146456547

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

178

$R_n$:

14.6559276

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

179

$d_n$:

0.145986987

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

179

$R_n$:

14.6998513

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

180

$d_n$:

0.145570633

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

180

$R_n$:

14.7390349

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

181

$d_n$:

0.145129143

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

181

$R_n$:

14.7808297

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

182

$d_n$:

0.144728999

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

182

$R_n$:

14.8189306

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

183

$d_n$:

0.144241128

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

183

$R_n$:

14.8656708

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

184

$d_n$:

0.143828827

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

184

$R_n$:

14.9054183

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

185

$d_n$:

0.143491119

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

185

$R_n$:

14.9381448

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

186

$d_n$:

0.143254308

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

186

$R_n$:

14.9611857

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

187

$d_n$:

0.142968385

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

187

$R_n$:

14.9891068

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

188

$d_n$:

0.142564370

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

188

$R_n$:

15.0287507

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

189

$d_n$:

0.142155510

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

189

$R_n$:

15.0690994

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

190

$d_n$:

0.141807750

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

190

$R_n$:

15.1036015

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

191

$d_n$:

0.141419137

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

191

$R_n$:

15.1423575

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

192

$d_n$:

0.141148886

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

192

$R_n$:

15.1694352

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

193

$d_n$:

0.140851275

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

193

$R_n$:

15.1993745

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

194

$d_n$:

0.140435349

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

194

$R_n$:

15.2414287

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

195

$d_n$:

0.139985714

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

195

$R_n$:

15.2871722

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

196

$d_n$:

0.139635551

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

196

$R_n$:

15.3230000

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

197

$d_n$:

0.139204248

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

197

$R_n$:

15.3673777

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

198

$d_n$:

0.138986341

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

198

$R_n$:

15.3899032

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

199

$d_n$:

0.138867090

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

199

$R_n$:

15.4022604

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

200

$d_n$:

0.138281269

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

200

$R_n$:

15.4632749

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

201

$d_n$:

0.137738910

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

201

$R_n$:

15.5202253

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

202

$d_n$:

0.137286933

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

202

$R_n$:

15.5680288

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

203

$d_n$:

0.136880964

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

203

$R_n$:

15.6112355

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

204

$d_n$:

0.136588846

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

204

$R_n$:

15.6424841

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

205

$d_n$:

0.136137880

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

205

$R_n$:

15.6909883

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

206

$d_n$:

0.135735328

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

206

$R_n$:

15.7345575

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

207

$d_n$:

0.135407867

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

207

$R_n$:

15.7701906

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

208

$d_n$:

0.135027805

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

208

$R_n$:

15.8117641

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

209

$d_n$:

0.134772058

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

209

$R_n$:

15.8398714

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

210

$d_n$:

0.134419628

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

210

$R_n$:

15.8787794

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

211

$d_n$:

0.134205558

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

211

$R_n$:

15.9025125

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

212

$d_n$:

0.133910316

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

212

$R_n$:

15.9353691

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

213

$d_n$:

0.133601820

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

213

$R_n$:

15.9698559

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

214

$d_n$:

0.133173562

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

214

$R_n$:

16.0179958

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

215

$d_n$:

0.132907036

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

215

$R_n$:

16.0481123

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

216

$d_n$:

0.132580677

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

216

$R_n$:

16.0851545

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

217

$d_n$:

0.132304067

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

217

$R_n$:

16.1166933

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

218

$d_n$:

0.132017097

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

218

$R_n$:

16.1495529

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

219

$d_n$:

0.131846500

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

219

$R_n$:

16.1691551

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

220

$d_n$:

0.131370700

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

220

$R_n$:

16.2240948

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

221

$d_n$:

0.131071611

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

221

$R_n$:

16.2588343

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

222

$d_n$:

0.130730149

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

222

$R_n$:

16.2986898

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

223

$d_n$:

0.130402183

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

223

$R_n$:

16.3371666

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

224

$d_n$:

0.130134357

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

224

$R_n$:

16.3687316

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

225

$d_n$:

0.129839746

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

225

$R_n$:

16.4036038

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

226

$d_n$:

0.129463927

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

226

$R_n$:

16.4483187

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

227

$d_n$:

0.129129147

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

227

$R_n$:

16.4883699

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

228

$d_n$:

0.128824493

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

228

$R_n$:

16.5249981

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

229

$d_n$:

0.128512697

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

229

$R_n$:

16.5626646

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

230

$d_n$:

0.128276566

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

230

$R_n$:

16.5913123

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

231

$d_n$:

0.127967764

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

231

$R_n$:

16.6289361

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

232

$d_n$:

0.127675564

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

232

$R_n$:

16.6647046

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

233

$d_n$:

0.127450555

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

233

$R_n$:

16.6923600

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

234

$d_n$:

0.127337147

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

234

$R_n$:

16.7063359

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

235

$d_n$:

0.127286578

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

235

$R_n$:

16.7125758

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

236

$d_n$:

0.126787767

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

236

$R_n$:

16.7743925

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

237

$d_n$:

0.126569619

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

237

$R_n$:

16.8015803

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

238

$d_n$:

0.126367063

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

238

$R_n$:

16.8269090

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

239

$d_n$:

0.126075538

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

239

$R_n$:

16.8635056

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

240

$d_n$:

0.125829911

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

240

$R_n$:

16.8944721

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

241

$d_n$:

0.125667099

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

241

$R_n$:

16.9150646

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

242

$d_n$:

0.125307719

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

242

$R_n$:

16.9607087

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

243

$d_n$:

0.124998063

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

243

$R_n$:

17.0002480

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

244

$d_n$:

0.124728665

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

244

$R_n$:

17.0348064

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

245

$d_n$:

0.124419202

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

245

$R_n$:

17.0746892

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

246

$d_n$:

0.124162505

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

246

$R_n$:

17.1079225

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

247

$d_n$:

0.123976658

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

247

$R_n$:

17.1320689

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

248

$d_n$:

0.123592834

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

248

$R_n$:

17.1821679

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

249

$d_n$:

0.123312149

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

249

$R_n$:

17.2190021

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

250

$d_n$:

0.122986444

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

250

$R_n$:

17.2619548

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

251

$d_n$:

0.122734099

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

251

$R_n$:

17.2953899

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

252

$d_n$:

0.122510015

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

252

$R_n$:

17.3251959

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

253

$d_n$:

0.122354532

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

253

$R_n$:

17.3459413

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

254

$d_n$:

0.121997848

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

254

$R_n$:

17.3937318

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

255

$d_n$:

0.121624825

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

255

$R_n$:

17.4440114

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

256

$d_n$:

0.121313206

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

256

$R_n$:

17.4862513

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

257

$d_n$:

0.121080304

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

257

$R_n$:

17.5179632

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

258

$d_n$:

0.120931883

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

258

$R_n$:

17.5382358

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

259

$d_n$:

0.120675570

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

259

$R_n$:

17.5733627

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

260

$d_n$:

0.120475864

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

260

$R_n$:

17.6008355

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

261

$d_n$:

0.120284540

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

261

$R_n$:

17.6272407

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

262

$d_n$:

0.120066255

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

262

$R_n$:

17.6574697

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

263

$d_n$:

0.119843022

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

263

$R_n$:

17.6884977

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

264

$d_n$:

0.119750627

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

264

$R_n$:

17.7013739

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

265

$d_n$:

0.119465572

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

265

$R_n$:

17.7412248

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

266

$d_n$:

0.119217314

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

266

$R_n$:

17.7760868

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

267

$d_n$:

0.119066393

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

267

$R_n$:

17.7973511

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

268

$d_n$:

0.118822175

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

268

$R_n$:

17.8318750

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

269

$d_n$:

0.118605818

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

269

$R_n$:

17.8625793

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

270

$d_n$:

0.118432435

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

270

$R_n$:

17.8872657

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

271

$d_n$:

0.118135765

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

271

$R_n$:

17.9296741

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

272

$d_n$:

0.117930163

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

272

$R_n$:

17.9591897

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

273

$d_n$:

0.117679598

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

273

$R_n$:

17.9952993

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

274

$d_n$:

0.117415095

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

274

$R_n$:

18.0335850

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

275

$d_n$:

0.117215061

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

275

$R_n$:

18.0626537

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

276

$d_n$:

0.116935701

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

276

$R_n$:

18.1034165

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

277

$d_n$:

0.116712818

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

277

$R_n$:

18.1360784

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

278

$d_n$:

0.116414259

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

278

$R_n$:

18.1800260

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

279

$d_n$:

0.116161765

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

279

$R_n$:

18.2173692

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

280

$d_n$:

0.115969437

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

280

$R_n$:

18.2459231

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

281

$d_n$:

0.115739370

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

281

$R_n$:

18.2802046

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

282

$d_n$:

0.115558351

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

282

$R_n$:

18.3072737

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

283

$d_n$:

0.115339699

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

283

$R_n$:

18.3400833

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

284

$d_n$:

0.115211168

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

284

$R_n$:

18.3594282

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

285

$d_n$:

0.114937835

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

285

$R_n$:

18.4007106

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

286

$d_n$:

0.114749685

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

286

$R_n$:

18.4292417

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

287

$d_n$:

0.114498749

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

287

$R_n$:

18.4674398

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

288

$d_n$:

0.114323041

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

288

$R_n$:

18.4942862

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

289

$d_n$:

0.114210768

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

289

$R_n$:

18.5114836

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

290

$d_n$:

0.113969043

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

290

$R_n$:

18.5486250

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

291

$d_n$:

0.113856045

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

291

$R_n$:

18.5660414

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

292

$d_n$:

0.113672944

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

292

$R_n$:

18.5943363

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

293

$d_n$:

0.113489418

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

293

$R_n$:

18.6227885

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

294

$d_n$:

0.113351219

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

294

$R_n$:

18.6442743

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

295

$d_n$:

0.113280961

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

295

$R_n$:

18.6552175

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

296

$d_n$:

0.112977912

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

296

$R_n$:

18.7025753

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

297

$d_n$:

0.112804592

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

297

$R_n$:

18.7297747

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

298

$d_n$:

0.112616768

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

298

$R_n$:

18.7593447

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

299

$d_n$:

0.112452698

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

299

$R_n$:

18.7852558

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

300

$d_n$:

0.112276581

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

300

$R_n$:

18.8131537

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

301

$d_n$:

0.112085863

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

301

$R_n$:

18.8434635

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

302

$d_n$:

0.111783166

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

302

$R_n$:

18.8917816

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

303

$d_n$:

0.111546748

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

303

$R_n$:

18.9297024

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

304

$d_n$:

0.111341591

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

304

$R_n$:

18.9627396

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

305

$d_n$:

0.111103498

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

305

$R_n$:

19.0012334

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

306

$d_n$:

0.110923838

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

306

$R_n$:

19.0303894

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

307

$d_n$:

0.110743122

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

307

$R_n$:

19.0598124

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

308

$d_n$:

0.110468663

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

308

$R_n$:

19.1046819

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

309

$d_n$:

0.110245505

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

309

$R_n$:

19.1413292

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

310

$d_n$:

0.110023635

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

310

$R_n$:

19.1779123

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

311

$d_n$:

0.109826579

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

311

$R_n$:

19.2105280

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

312

$d_n$:

0.109687696

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

312

$R_n$:

19.2335857

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

313

$d_n$:

0.109547055

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

313

$R_n$:

19.2569947

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

314

$d_n$:

0.109372153

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

314

$R_n$:

19.2861902

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

315

$d_n$:

0.109276039

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

315

$R_n$:

19.3022740

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

316

$d_n$:

0.109086694

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

316

$R_n$:

19.3340418

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

317

$d_n$:

0.108887414

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

317

$R_n$:

19.3675957

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

318

$d_n$:

0.108745497

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

318

$R_n$:

19.3915661

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

319

$d_n$:

0.108552423

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

319

$R_n$:

19.4242778

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

320

$d_n$:

0.108394000

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

320

$R_n$:

19.4512057

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

321

$d_n$:

0.108201327

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

321

$R_n$:

19.4840616

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

322

$d_n$:

0.108017018

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

322

$R_n$:

19.5156009

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

323

$d_n$:

0.107829955

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

323

$R_n$:

19.5477218

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

324

$d_n$:

0.107708372

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

324

$R_n$:

19.5686588

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

325

$d_n$:

0.107531266

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

325

$R_n$:

19.5992417

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

326

$d_n$:

0.107404337

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

326

$R_n$:

19.6212220

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

327

$d_n$:

0.107243315

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

327

$R_n$:

19.6491810

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

328

$d_n$:

0.107091523

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

328

$R_n$:

19.6756144

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

329

$d_n$:

0.106923084

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

329

$R_n$:

19.7050348

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

330

$d_n$:

0.106767393

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

330

$R_n$:

19.7323109

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

331

$d_n$:

0.106606370

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

331

$R_n$:

19.7606051

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

332

$d_n$:

0.106424823

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

332

$R_n$:

19.7926082

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

333

$d_n$:

0.106256694

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

333

$R_n$:

19.8223436

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

334

$d_n$:

0.106077470

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

334

$R_n$:

19.8541449

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

335

$d_n$:

0.105903600

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

335

$R_n$:

19.8850992

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

336

$d_n$:

0.105713865

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

336

$R_n$:

19.9189941

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

337

$d_n$:

0.105538643

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

337

$R_n$:

19.9504047

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

338

$d_n$:

0.105319901

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

338

$R_n$:

19.9897633

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

339

$d_n$:

0.105147705

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

339

$R_n$:

20.0208622

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

340

$d_n$:

0.104972095

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

340

$R_n$:

20.0526826

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

341

$d_n$:

0.104828893

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

341

$R_n$:

20.0787095

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

342

$d_n$:

0.104705652

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

342

$R_n$:

20.1011656

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

343

$d_n$:

0.104639446

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

343

$R_n$:

20.1132510

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

344

$d_n$:

0.104403381

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

344

$R_n$:

20.1564677

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

345

$d_n$:

0.104325776

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

345

$R_n$:

20.1707177

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

346

$d_n$:

0.104196674

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

346

$R_n$:

20.1944706

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

347

$d_n$:

0.104044210

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

347

$R_n$:

20.2225979

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

348

$d_n$:

0.103975651

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

348

$R_n$:

20.2352727

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

349

$d_n$:

0.103942494

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

349

$R_n$:

20.2414087

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

350

$d_n$:

0.103631587

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

350

$R_n$:

20.2991352

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

351

$d_n$:

0.103475079

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

351

$R_n$:

20.3283253

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

352

$d_n$:

0.103319351

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

352

$R_n$:

20.3574581

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

353

$d_n$:

0.103166426

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

353

$R_n$:

20.3861519

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

354

$d_n$:

0.103035319

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

354

$R_n$:

20.4108196

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

355

$d_n$:

0.102907703

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

355

$R_n$:

20.4348911

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

356

$d_n$:

0.102721872

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

356

$R_n$:

20.4700502

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

357

$d_n$:

0.102576419

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

357

$R_n$:

20.4976587

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

358

$d_n$:

0.102444128

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

358

$R_n$:

20.5228368

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

359

$d_n$:

0.102300193

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

359

$R_n$:

20.5503053

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

360

$d_n$:

0.102128845

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

360

$R_n$:

20.5831059

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

361

$d_n$:

0.102059002

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

361

$R_n$:

20.5965076

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

362

$d_n$:

0.101833424

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

362

$R_n$:

20.6399170

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

363

$d_n$:

0.101712462

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

363

$R_n$:

20.6632739

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

364

$d_n$:

0.101566956

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

364

$R_n$:

20.6914438

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

365

$d_n$:

0.101408289

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

365

$R_n$:

20.7222538

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

366

$d_n$:

0.101283497

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

366

$R_n$:

20.7465536

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

367

$d_n$:

0.101141292

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

367

$R_n$:

20.7743173

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

368

$d_n$:

0.100909588

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

368

$R_n$:

20.8197221

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

369

$d_n$:

0.100734566

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

369

$R_n$:

20.8541582

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

370

$d_n$:

0.100558466

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

370

$R_n$:

20.8889272

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

371

$d_n$:

0.100382788

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

371

$R_n$:

20.9237343

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

372

$d_n$:

0.100268761

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

372

$R_n$:

20.9463919

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

373

$d_n$:

0.100141276

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

373

$R_n$:

20.9717848

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

374

$d_n$:

0.100037879

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

374

$R_n$:

20.9924271

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

375

$d_n$:

0.0998883022

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

375

$R_n$:

21.0223645

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

376

$d_n$:

0.0998104073

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

376

$R_n$:

21.0379906

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

377

$d_n$:

0.0996840637

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

377

$R_n$:

21.0633875

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

378

$d_n$:

0.0995544703

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

378

$R_n$:

21.0895047

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

379

$d_n$:

0.0994505600

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

379

$R_n$:

21.1104951

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

380

$d_n$:

0.0993241547

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

380

$R_n$:

21.1360888

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

381

$d_n$:

0.0991828312

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

381

$R_n$:

21.1647803

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

382

$d_n$:

0.0990733538

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

382

$R_n$:

21.1870627

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

383

$d_n$:

0.0989175517

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

383

$R_n$:

21.2188587

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

384

$d_n$:

0.0987639002

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

384

$R_n$:

21.2503141

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

385

$d_n$:

0.0985969241

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

385

$R_n$:

21.2846084

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

386

$d_n$:

0.0984855444

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

386

$R_n$:

21.3075488

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

387

$d_n$:

0.0983279083

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

387

$R_n$:

21.3401052

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

388

$d_n$:

0.0982136115

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

388

$R_n$:

21.3637762

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

389

$d_n$:

0.0980758096

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

389

$R_n$:

21.3923884

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

390

$d_n$:

0.0979317481

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

390

$R_n$:

21.4223864

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

391

$d_n$:

0.0978184289

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

391

$R_n$:

21.4460450

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

392

$d_n$:

0.0977013249

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

392

$R_n$:

21.4705515

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

393

$d_n$:

0.0975695198

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

393

$R_n$:

21.4982048

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

394

$d_n$:

0.0974377179

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

394

$R_n$:

21.5259323

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

395

$d_n$:

0.0973158279

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

395

$R_n$:

21.5516414

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

396

$d_n$:

0.0971886078

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

396

$R_n$:

21.5785436

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

397

$d_n$:

0.0970541709

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

397

$R_n$:

21.6070484

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

398

$d_n$:

0.0969263615

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

398

$R_n$:

21.6342214

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

399

$d_n$:

0.0968107354

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

399

$R_n$:

21.6588659

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

400

$d_n$:

0.0966792733

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

400

$R_n$:

21.6869573

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

401

$d_n$:

0.0965664256

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

401

$R_n$:

21.7111321

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

402

$d_n$:

0.0964829810

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

402

$R_n$:

21.7290444

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

403

$d_n$:

0.0962944534

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

403

$R_n$:

21.7696283

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

404

$d_n$:

0.0961350919

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

404

$R_n$:

21.8040577

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

405

$d_n$:

0.0960450358

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

405

$R_n$:

21.8235645

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

406

$d_n$:

0.0959593914

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

406

$R_n$:

21.8421497

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

407

$d_n$:

0.0958696600

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

407

$R_n$:

21.8616574

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

408

$d_n$:

0.0958070162

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

408

$R_n$:

21.8752979

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

409

$d_n$:

0.0957470288

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

409

$R_n$:

21.8883766

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

410

$d_n$:

0.0955940019

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

410

$R_n$:

21.9218148

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

411

$d_n$:

0.0955194058

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

411

$R_n$:

21.9381537

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

412

$d_n$:

0.0954192864

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

412

$R_n$:

21.9601232

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

413

$d_n$:

0.0952958394

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

413

$R_n$:

21.9872751

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

414

$d_n$:

0.0952128129

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

414

$R_n$:

22.0055762

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

415

$d_n$:

0.0951654650

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

415

$R_n$:

22.0160272

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

416

$d_n$:

0.0949987648

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

416

$R_n$:

22.0529053

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

417

$d_n$:

0.0949109099

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

417

$R_n$:

22.0723931

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

418

$d_n$:

0.0948043382

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

418

$R_n$:

22.0960810

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

419

$d_n$:

0.0947029751

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

419

$R_n$:

22.1186607

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

420

$d_n$:

0.0946282691

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

420

$R_n$:

22.1353332

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

421

$d_n$:

0.0946087981

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

421

$R_n$:

22.1396830

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

422

$d_n$:

0.0942954346

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

422

$R_n$:

22.2099346

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

423

$d_n$:

0.0941125883

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

423

$R_n$:

22.2511422

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

424

$d_n$:

0.0939558772

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

424

$R_n$:

22.2865875

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

425

$d_n$:

0.0938536707

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

425

$R_n$:

22.3097685

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

426

$d_n$:

0.0937311214

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

426

$R_n$:

22.3376301

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

427

$d_n$:

0.0936091732

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

427

$R_n$:

22.3654275

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

428

$d_n$:

0.0934761458

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

428

$R_n$:

22.3958329

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

429

$d_n$:

0.0933568963

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

429

$R_n$:

22.4231629

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

430

$d_n$:

0.0932342652

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

430

$R_n$:

22.4513408

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

431

$d_n$:

0.0930843574

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

431

$R_n$:

22.4858872

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

432

$d_n$:

0.0929572585

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

432

$R_n$:

22.5152644

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

433

$d_n$:

0.0928605486

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

433

$R_n$:

22.5376716

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

434

$d_n$:

0.0926936220

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

434

$R_n$:

22.5764576

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

435

$d_n$:

0.0925895793

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

435

$R_n$:

22.6007030

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

436

$d_n$:

0.0924967244

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

436

$R_n$:

22.6223873

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

437

$d_n$:

0.0923541571

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

437

$R_n$:

22.6557658

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

438

$d_n$:

0.0922733903

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

438

$R_n$:

22.6747211

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

439

$d_n$:

0.0921709130

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

439

$R_n$:

22.6988194

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

440

$d_n$:

0.0920737177

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

440

$R_n$:

22.7217253

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

441

$d_n$:

0.0919899417

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

441

$R_n$:

22.7415074

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

442

$d_n$:

0.0918777279

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

442

$R_n$:

22.7680612

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

443

$d_n$:

0.0917825063

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

443

$R_n$:

22.7906449

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

444

$d_n$:

0.0916863299

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

444

$R_n$:

22.8135026

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

445

$d_n$:

0.0915785976

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

445

$R_n$:

22.8391639

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

446

$d_n$:

0.0914963493

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

446

$R_n$:

22.8587956

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

447

$d_n$:

0.0913863229

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

447

$R_n$:

22.8851130

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

448

$d_n$:

0.0913107329

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

448

$R_n$:

22.9032302

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

449

$d_n$:

0.0912076284

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

449

$R_n$:

22.9279904

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

450

$d_n$:

0.0911320251

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

450

$R_n$:

22.9461819

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

451

$d_n$:

0.0910183568

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

451

$R_n$:

22.9735894

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

452

$d_n$:

0.0909383625

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

452

$R_n$:

22.9929186

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

453

$d_n$:

0.0908911784

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

453

$R_n$:

23.0043357

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

454

$d_n$:

0.0906928159

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

454

$R_n$:

23.0524634

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

455

$d_n$:

0.0906023668

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

455

$R_n$:

23.0744785

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

456

$d_n$:

0.0904864234

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

456

$R_n$:

23.1027633

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

457

$d_n$:

0.0903780799

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

457

$R_n$:

23.1292597

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

458

$d_n$:

0.0902961025

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

458

$R_n$:

23.1493502

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

459

$d_n$:

0.0902050048

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

459

$R_n$:

23.1717188

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

460

$d_n$:

0.0900319004

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

460

$R_n$:

23.2143484

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

461

$d_n$:

0.0899204620

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

461

$R_n$:

23.2418786

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

462

$d_n$:

0.0898702527

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

462

$R_n$:

23.2543048

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

463

$d_n$:

0.0897360886

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

463

$R_n$:

23.2875772

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

464

$d_n$:

0.0896289087

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

464

$R_n$:

23.3142291

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

465

$d_n$:

0.0895130350

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

465

$R_n$:

23.3431146

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

466

$d_n$:

0.0894173222

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

466

$R_n$:

23.3670308

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

467

$d_n$:

0.0893309921

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

467

$R_n$:

23.3886465

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

468

$d_n$:

0.0892146478

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

468

$R_n$:

23.4178434

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

469

$d_n$:

0.0890976607

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

469

$R_n$:

23.4472785

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

470

$d_n$:

0.0890086529

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

470

$R_n$:

23.4697255

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

471

$d_n$:

0.0889105315

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

471

$R_n$:

23.4945230

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

472

$d_n$:

0.0888397054

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

472

$R_n$:

23.5124565

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

473

$d_n$:

0.0887177472

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

473

$R_n$:

23.5434038

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

474

$d_n$:

0.0886305506

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

474

$R_n$:

23.5655825

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

475

$d_n$:

0.0885926413

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

475

$R_n$:

23.5752384

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

476

$d_n$:

0.0884923598

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

476

$R_n$:

23.6008212

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

477

$d_n$:

0.0884588374

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

477

$R_n$:

23.6093860

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

478

$d_n$:

0.0884086112

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

478

$R_n$:

23.6222307

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

479

$d_n$:

0.0883643660

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

479

$R_n$:

23.6335580

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

480

$d_n$:

0.0883311626

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

480

$R_n$:

23.6420659

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

481

$d_n$:

0.0883172167

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

481

$R_n$:

23.6456412

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

482

$d_n$:

0.0881109550

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

482

$R_n$:

23.6986531

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

483

$d_n$:

0.0880231012

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

483

$R_n$:

23.7213081

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

484

$d_n$:

0.0879470007

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

484

$R_n$:

23.7409688

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

485

$d_n$:

0.0878553105

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

485

$R_n$:

23.7647024

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

486

$d_n$:

0.0877829797

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

486

$R_n$:

23.7834599

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

487

$d_n$:

0.0876941069

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

487

$R_n$:

23.8065496

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

488

$d_n$:

0.0875822099

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

488

$R_n$:

23.8356878

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

489

$d_n$:

0.0875329166

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

489

$R_n$:

23.8485475

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

490

$d_n$:

0.0874536612

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

490

$R_n$:

23.8692541

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

491

$d_n$:

0.0873479827

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

491

$R_n$:

23.8969226

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

492

$d_n$:

0.0872457058

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

492

$R_n$:

23.9237643

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

493

$d_n$:

0.0871772948

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

493

$R_n$:

23.9417534

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

494

$d_n$:

0.0870900673

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

494

$R_n$:

23.9647314

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

495

$d_n$:

0.0869943679

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

495

$R_n$:

23.9899941

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

496

$d_n$:

0.0869086676

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

496

$R_n$:

24.0126644

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

497

$d_n$:

0.0867723631

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

497

$R_n$:

24.0488133

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

498

$d_n$:

0.0867508206

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

498

$R_n$:

24.0545370

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

499

$d_n$:

0.0867279990

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

499

$R_n$:

24.0606035

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

500

$d_n$:

0.0864641987

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.

500

$R_n$:

24.1309609

comment: Packomania [7] lists this as the best packing known; optimality is open.