relevance-selection.json

back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files · download

801 bytes, as of the version from 2026-10-27 01:06 (current). Recorded here, not run.

{
  "tid": "T426",
  "skill_sha256": "b4d51ded0d52cfe3dcc0859de0845c3879b0c2363273ba7e809a7e06ded40b18",
  "base_revision": "d2fedab12af42d847159698ddf98e5d8f5f71043b33895dd4277e373d6e5863e",
  "selection_status": "unresolved full-grid relevance; numerical entries retained",
  "complete_note": "it retains every reduced rational nome $q=a/b$ with $b\\leq12$ and $0<q\\leq9/10$ (43 entries). These are reference-grid cutoffs, not intrinsic theta-function distinctions. The small size of the value near $q=1$ is not a mathematical reason to exclude it. This rational-nome selection is different from the rational elliptic parameters in HREF{Values_of_the_elliptic_nome}",
  "approval": "none; human review required",
  "changes_parameters": false,
  "retains_selected_literal_keys_and_numbers": true
}