back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files · download
1279 bytes, as of the version from 2026-10-29 11:13 (current). Recorded here, not run.
# Audit disposition for T607
The authenticated site audit reports one structural question: `algebra` takes
four symbolic names, each with a set of entries. It reports no other findings.
The raw response is retained in audit.json; its `clean` field is false.
The builder retains this table boundary for a specific mathematical reason.
The quantity is Z_g(2m), the representation-dimension zeta function. Cartan
type indexes the algebra whose representations are summed. It does not choose
among different invariants, derivatives, normalizations, or specializations.
This is the canonical skill's distinction between what a number is of and
which quantity is taken of it, and is also the explicitly requested family
boundary in issue #242. The header Z_g(2m) denotes every row.
The audit implementation explicitly calls this a question, not a verdict. It
flags any draft with two to four symbolic labels and at least two entries per
label, without inspecting this distinction. Adding another algebra, converting
names to integers, or splitting the invariant solely to make the warning
vanish would evade the mathematical question. No such change was made.
The independent critique should assess this disposition; the raw warning is
not suppressed and no clean audit is claimed.