back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files · download
1479 bytes, as of the version from 2026-10-29 19:59 (current). Recorded here, not run.
# T611 audit disposition
The final authenticated endpoint `/api/table/T611/audit` reports exactly one
finding: the symbolic parameter `family` has two names, each with multiple
entries, so its shape resembles bundled quantities. `clean` is therefore
false; this report does not claim a clean audit.
The finding was inspected against the current skill and family proposal.
Here `family` and `n` identify **which polyhedron** the number is the volume
of. They do not switch **which quantity** is computed. Every row is the
ordinary volume in curvature -1, and the number-header is Vol(P). This is
the skill's legitimate object-argument case, like a common invariant across
named graph or lattice families. Family issue #245 explicitly proposes both
geometric families in this one volume table and reserves growth rates for a
separate table. The definition states the single invariant and both domains;
argument-selection.md assesses each family separately.
The audit code's structural test intentionally asks a question rather than
settling it and has no semantic exception for an accepted object argument.
No values or arguments were removed to evade that test. No source or audit
code was edited. Independent critique should assess this disposition. There
are no other findings: the earlier definition-length warning was addressed
by moving the combinatorial construction to Comments, before numbers were
filled. All 54 read-back values pass the independent numerical checks.