back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files · download
1819 bytes, as of the version from 2026-10-30 12:33 (current). Recorded here, not run.
# Build audit response for T624
The final site audit has one structural advisory, and `clean` remains false.
It flags the two symbolic scalar-field labels as potentially selecting two
quantities. This is retained for the independent critic to assess. The field
specifies the space whose volume is measured: the definition, parameter titles,
number header and argument-selection note all describe the same named quantity,
the Frobenius volume of a Stiefel manifold. It is the skill's argument-index
case. The family proposal explicitly uses this shared field parameter.
The build has not changed the identifiers or divided the table to silence a
structural heuristic; the audit implementation documents that it cannot decide
this distinction from shape alone.
The other initial finding, an overlong definition, was addressed by putting the
matrix-space and metric formulas in Formulas and retaining the object and
normalization reference in Definition. No values or selected arguments changed.
The existing tag `volume`, along with `groups` and `integral`, is used.
`Riemannian geometry` is absent and is proposed for T624, T571 and T572, plus
this family's future Grassmann companion. No new tag or published-table edits
were made.
The table declares repeats against T28 because its one-column cases are the
same unit-sphere volume computation. The projective-space relations to T571
and T572 follow from quotient geometry and metric rescaling; these are not
marked as repeated computations. The Grassmann companion is unbuilt, so no
identifier or link has been invented for it.
This is build evidence, not an independent critique or approval. The controller
must obtain a separate numerical critique and argument-selection sidecar before
offering the draft. No offer, publication or human review action occurred.