back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files · download
1260 bytes, as of the version from 2026-10-30 22:26 (current). Recorded here, not run.
# Audit disposition for T632
The live audit returned one finding: the symbolic `convention` parameter
contains two labels, each over the same geometric cases. No other findings
were reported. The result is retained verbatim in `audit.json` with
`clean: false`; it is not represented as a clean audit.
This is the skill's explicit one-number-in-two-conventions exception. The
Definition already states that the positive determinant and its real natural
logarithm are one number in two invertible conventions. The spectral formula
states both conversions, the parameter values are labeled D0 and log D0,
and the number header matches them. The domains and stored extents coincide.
The family proposal and T595, T600 and T631 use the same convention.
Inspection of `_one_named_quantity` in the snapshot's audit implementation
shows that this draft check reports the structural question without parsing
its prose answer. Its own guidance says to state the convention exception in
the definition and keep the entries together. That has been done. Splitting
or deleting one convention to silence this advisory would contradict the
family and skill. The separate critic should independently assess this
exception. No policy, check, or website source was modified.