back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files · download
2085 bytes, as of the version from 2026-11-01 17:54 (current). Recorded here, not run.
# T655 build audit dispositions
The authenticated site audit was run after filling the draft. Its raw response
is preserved in audit.json. It reports two findings and `clean: false`.
Neither finding identifies a numerical failure; both require explicit review.
1. **Two names in the convention parameter.** Retained. The Definition says
"one number in two invertible conventions" and names C_n and J_n=C_n/n.
The source normalization is documented in BCC equation (4.10), and each
value determines the other once the already-declared dimension is known.
Both conventions have the same domain and 100-digit precision. Conversion
was verified on all 31 pairs read from the database. This is precisely the
skill's permitted exception. The audit's structural heuristic warns for
this shape even when the stated exception applies. No additional quantity
has been smuggled into the selector.
2. **The matrix multiplication tag.** Retained to follow the family convention
and the checked mathematical connection. A fresh authenticated tag read
returns `table_count: 1`, with its one public table explicitly identified as
T5, "Exponent of matrix multiplication complexity". T655 is a draft and
is omitted from that public count. The source audit tests the cached count
against 1 without adding the current draft, so "reaches only this table"
is inaccurate here: the count refers to T5. This is an existing tag with
another live table, not a newly invented singleton. Raw evidence is in
tag-matrix-multiplication.json. No tag or audit implementation was changed.
The audit reports no unresolved citations, broken internal links, invalid
number types, definition-length problem, or conflicting parameter labels.
It is the API audit, without an external `--links` check; the three primary
paper pages were fetched separately and archived with their hashes.
The separate critic should assess these dispositions. The builder has not
created an independent argument-review sidecar, offered the draft, published
it, or acted as its human reviewer.