History of Hermite polynomials in physicist's convention

back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files

when	who	what
2026-08-14 21:32	bmatschke	how well the digits are known: exact (type Z[])	current
2026-08-13 22:08	bmatschke	how well the digits are known: exact (type Z[])
2026-08-09 09:16	flattening	entries rewritten as records with named parameters
2026-08-09 08:35	data-repository import	the current state of the data repository	reviewed
2021-12-05 13:42	bmatschke	from the data repository, a3c12bfa
2021-09-30 21:03	bmatschke	from the data repository, 1c889387
2021-09-30 20:45	bmatschke	from the data repository, 009e3153

What changed between 2026-08-13 22:08 and 2026-08-14 21:32

from line 36 (6 lines, 2 more than before) @@ -36,4 +36,6 @@

   complete: 'no'   rigour: exact+  rigour details: An exact value -- an integer, a rational or a polynomial -- so there+    is no precision to choose and nothing to be wrong about. Display properties:   number-header: $H_n(x)$