History of Zeros of the polygamma functions $\psi^{(n)}$

back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files

compare when who what
2026-09-02 20:38 bmatschke interactive say what the table covers instead of only that it is incomplete; say why the entries are so near half-integers; drop the comparison with six tables it does not link current
2026-08-30 20:13 zeta3 with assisted by Claude (Opus 5) generator zeros of the polygamma functions, computed by bisection on brackets proven in ball arithmetic reviewed
2026-08-30 20:13 zeta3 generator checking that this table can be written to
2026-08-30 20:12 zeta3 created this table

What changed between 2026-08-30 20:13 and 2026-09-02 20:38

from line 14 (5 lines, 1 fewer than before) @@ -14,6 +14,5 @@
     a pole, $\psi^{(n)}(x) = (-1)^{n+1} n! \sum_{j \geq 0} (x+j)^{-n-1}$; when $n$     is odd the exponent $n+1$ is even, every term has the same sign, and the sum cannot-    vanish. So the odd orders are absent from this table rather than missing from-    it.+    vanish.   comment-one-zero-per-gap: For even $n$ the function $\psi^{(n+1)}$ has no real zeros     by CITE{comment-only-even-n}, and so has constant sign. Hence $\psi^{(n)}$ is
from line 28 (11 lines, 2 more than before) @@ -29,9 +28,11 @@
     which $\Gamma$ attains its minimum on the positive reals, since $\Gamma' = \psi     \Gamma$ and $\Gamma > 0$ there. CITE{OEIS}-  comment-index-is-proven: 'Unlike the neighbouring tables of Airy and Bessel extrema,-    the index here is proven and not merely computed. Those record that they cannot-    establish a value to be the $n$-th zero rather than a neighbour, which would need-    a count of the zeros below it. Here CITE{comment-one-zero-per-gap} supplies that-    count: one zero per gap, so counting the gaps counts the zeros.'+  comment-half-integers: For even $n\geq 2$ the $k$-th largest zero tends to $-k+\tfrac12$+    as $n\to\infty$, which is why so many entries here are half-integers to many digits.+    In the series of CITE{comment-only-even-n} the terms $j=k-1-m$ and $j=k+m$ cancel+    in pairs at the midpoint of $(-k,-k+1)$, since $n+1$ is odd; what is left are+    the terms $j\geq 2k$, which have no partner because the sum starts at $j=0$. Balancing+    that remainder against the two nearest poles puts the zero above the midpoint+    by about $\dfrac{(2k+1)^{-(n+1)}}{4(n+1)}$. Links:   Wiki:
from line 55 (5 lines, 1 more than before) @@ -54,4 +55,5 @@
     index is proven too, by the monotonicity in the comments. Checked against mpmath     at 75 zeros and against OEIS A030169 for the positive zero of the digamma.+  complete-note: every even $n\leq 40$ is here, with the $50$ largest zeros of each Display properties:   number-header: $k$<sup>th</sup> largest zero of $\psi^{(n)}$ 

Sign in to restore an earlier version.