History of Stieltjes constants

back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files

compare when who what
2026-08-15 11:00 bmatschke how well the digits are known: assumed-bound (mpmath's quadrature returns an estimated error, not a bound) current
2026-08-13 22:04 bmatschke how well the digits are known: assumed-bound (interval widened by a hand-chosen 4 ulps (blur_real_interval))
2026-08-09 09:10 flattening entries rewritten as records with named parameters
2026-08-09 08:33 data-repository import the current state of the data repository reviewed
2021-03-13 05:07 bmatschke from the data repository, aa368e56
2021-03-12 17:30 bmatschke from the data repository, 257ff8c5
2021-03-09 13:06 bmatschke from the data repository, 74f1d5b0
2021-03-08 21:01 bmatschke from the data repository, 2b2b66e6

What changed between 2026-08-13 22:04 and 2026-08-15 11:00

from line 36 (12 lines, 5 more than before) @@ -36,7 +36,12 @@
   complete: 'no'   rigour: assumed-bound-  rigour details: The computed interval was widened by four units in the last place-    (blur_real_interval). That bound was asserted rather than derived, and the justification-    was not recorded.+  rigour details: Rests on mpmath's stieltjes, which evaluates a contour integral+    by numerical quadrature. mpmath's quadrature returns an error *estimate*, and+    its own documentation says the result may still be inaccurate for some functions;+    the working precision it uses is the requested precision plus ten bits and the+    square root of n, which for the largest n here is about forty. The interval was+    then widened by four units in the last place, a bound asserted rather than derived.+    Recomputing at double precision agrees to about 104 digits, so the hundred written+    are very likely right. Display properties:   number-header: $\gamma_n$ 

Sign in to restore an earlier version.