History of Keiper-Li coefficients

back to table · edit · history · where entries came from · files

compare when who what
2026-08-15 11:00 bmatschke migration how well the digits are known: assumed-bound (built on stieltjes, whose quadrature estimates its error) current
2026-08-13 22:04 bmatschke migration how well the digits are known: assumed-bound (interval widened by a hand-chosen 4 ulps (blur_real_interval))
2026-08-09 09:11 flattening migration entries rewritten as records with named parameters
2026-08-09 08:34 data-repository import migration the current state of the data repository reviewed
2021-03-18 22:50 bmatschke data-repository@5106324b from the data repository, 5106324b
2021-03-18 19:47 bmatschke data-repository@8cff689d from the data repository, 8cff689d
2021-03-18 06:43 bmatschke data-repository@5ae506ce from the data repository, 5ae506ce
2021-03-18 05:21 bmatschke data-repository@0ed96e75 from the data repository, 0ed96e75
2021-03-18 05:09 bmatschke data-repository@680f52ad from the data repository, 680f52ad
2021-03-17 16:05 Alex J Best data-repository@49e7513d from the data repository, 49e7513d
2021-03-14 21:31 bmatschke data-repository@47e1e6af from the data repository, 47e1e6af
2021-03-13 05:07 bmatschke data-repository@aa368e56 from the data repository, aa368e56

What changed between 2026-08-13 22:04 and 2026-08-15 11:00

from line 80 (12 lines, 5 more than before) @@ -80,7 +80,12 @@
   complete: 'no'   rigour: assumed-bound-  rigour details: The computed interval was widened by four units in the last place-    (blur_real_interval). That bound was asserted rather than derived, and the justification-    was not recorded.+  rigour details: Rests on mpmath's stieltjes, which evaluates a contour integral+    by numerical quadrature. mpmath's quadrature returns an error *estimate*, and+    its own documentation says the result may still be inaccurate for some functions;+    the working precision it uses is the requested precision plus ten bits and the+    square root of n, which for the largest n here is about forty. The interval was+    then widened by four units in the last place, a bound asserted rather than derived.+    Recomputing at double precision agrees to about 104 digits, so the hundred written+    are very likely right. Display properties:   number-header: $\lambda_n$ 

Sign in to restore an earlier version.